By DWR News:
A recently released technical report concludes that the sinking of land in the Central Valley due to over-pumping of groundwater, referred to as subsidence, has restricted the amount of water the State Water Project (SWP) can deliver in a year by 3 percent. By 2043, if no action is taken, the current trajectory of subsidence, combined with climate change, could reduce deliveries by 87 percent. The SWP, one of California’s primary water storage and delivery systems, helps supply water to 27 million Californians and 750,000 acres of farmland and businesses throughout the state.
The technical report, an addendum that builds on the Delivery Capability Report (DCR) released in 2024, analyzed the capability of the SWP to deliver water under both current and potential future conditions in the year 2043. The new findings underscore the importance of eliminating groundwater overdraft in the Central Valley and repairing existing damage to the state’s main water-delivery arteries.
The Delivery Capability Report presented findings that if no new adaptation actions are taken, SWP delivery capability and reliability could be reduced by as much as 23 percent in 20 years due to changing flow patterns and extreme weather shifts. Such a decline is equivalent to the loss of nearly 500,000 acre-feet, enough to supply 1.7 million homes for a year.
The addendum analyzes additional potential changes to future deliveries due to damage to major SWP canals tied to groundwater pumping and oil and gas production. It also looks at the impacts under different combinations of hydrology and subsidence scenarios.
Looking ahead to 2043, the addendum finds that:
- The long-term average delivery capability of the SWP is reduced by 18 to 87 percent compared to the Delivery Capability Report baseline.
- Under a moderate climate change scenario coupled with a moderate level of subsidence, average annual SWP deliveries could decline 400,000 acre-feet to 1.8 million acre-feet.
- Under extreme climate change and subsidence conditions, the project’s average annual deliveries could decrease by 1.5 million acre-feet, to 295,000 acre-feet.
- Failure to halt subsidence and fix canal chokepoints will limit the state’s ability to move water into storage in high-precipitation years and cut into supplies the state needs to endure dry years.
The addendum also explores different levels of compliance with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) because of the uncertainties around how and when groundwater basins will be brought into sustainable management. Excessive pumping of groundwater as well as oil and gas production along some stretches of the canals have caused the overlying surface of the land to fall.
Sinking land has created dips or “bowls,” where water pools, restricting the movement of water. SWP operators have adjusted operations for years to overcome the effects of subsiding land, but they have reached the limits of those adjustments. The effect of 2023 levels of subsidence can be observed in the need to run water closer to the top of the concrete liner in subsided canals than standard operating procedures would dictate.
Strategies to Address Subsidence
In 2017, DWR released its first in-depth study of the magnitude, location, and effects of subsidence on the California Aqueduct, a critical part of the SWP. DWR then created the California Aqueduct Subsidence Program to work with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the owner of the San Luis Canal, and local groundwater sustainability agencies on a range of solutions to prevent the effects of subsidence from impending operations.
DWR is protecting SWP water deliveries by implementing projects to restore SWP capacity, engaging with ground water sustainability agencies to stop additional detrimental subsidence, and working with its partners to secure additional funding sources for this work. DWR is committed to ensuring that the dire outcomes of a future with unchecked subsidence do not occur.
To learn more about the impacts of subsidence on SWP facilities in the San Joaquin Valley, visit the DWR webpage.
dcr2023_impacts_of_subsidence_20250506FOR MORE ON CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SUBSIDENCE:
DWR NEWS: Study finds that subsidence, groundwater over-pumping could limit future water State Water Project deliveries if no action is taken
By DWR News: A recently released technical report concludes that the sinking of land in the Central Valley due to over-pumping of groundwater, referred to as subsidence, has restricted the amount of water the State Water Project (SWP) can deliver in a year by 3 percent. By 2043, if no action is taken, the current trajectory of subsidence, combined with climate change, could reduce deliveries by 87 percent. The SWP, one of California’s primary water storage and delivery systems, helps […]
SJV WATER: Kern groundwater agency bans pumping along sinking California Aqueduct
By Lois Henry, SJV Water A groundwater agency on the western fringes of Kern County has taken the unprecedented step of banning all pumping from wells along the California Aqueduct for a 30-mile stretch. The move is mainly designed to protect the vital artery that moves hundreds of millions of gallons of water a day from northern to southern California and is threatened by sinking land that could crimp its ability to function. The ban is also intended to prove […]
NOTEBOOK FEATURE: Fixing California Aqueduct subsidence: A multi-billion dollar problem
The aqueduct capacity in certain areas of the Southern San Joaquin Valley is nearly reduced by half due to subsidence. In California, 80% of the usable fresh water is located far from where it’s actually used, so water conveyance infrastructure is vital to the state’s existence. Spanning 444 miles, the California Aqueduct is a vital component of the State Water Project, serving as a crucial source of water for 27 million Californians, providing water for agriculture and municipalities. Unfortunately, land […]
CA WATER COMMISSION: Update on the California Aqueduct Subsidence Program
At the September meeting of the California Water Commission, Daniel Whisman, principal engineer and program manager for DWR’s California Aqueduct Subsidence Program, updated the Commissioners on the Department’s ongoing efforts to address subsidence impacts to the aqueduct, including the status of the early implementation and long term projects and the program’s efforts to support the human right to water as codified in section 106.3 of the California Water Code. The California Aqueduct is a key component of the State Water […]
WATER COMMISSION: Conveyance projects panel discusses Imperial Valley to San Diego pipeline, “fish-friendly” Delta diversions, and more …
Presentations highlight San Diego CWA’s Regional Water Conveyance System Study, addressing California Aqueduct subsidence, and the San Joaquin Valley Water Blueprint The Water Resilience Portfolio directs the Water Commission to assess the state’s role in financing conveyance projects that could help meet the needs in changing climate, a task that the Commission has taken on wholeheartedly in recent months. (Here is coverage from the September meeting.) At their November meeting, the Commission heard from two panels: the first panel was […]
CA WATER COMMISSION: Addressing California Aqueduct subsidence; State Water Project Operations and Maintenance
At the November meeeting of the California Water Commission, Commissioners were briefed on subsidence issues with the California Aqueduct and current construction and maintenance projects underway for the State Water Project. CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT SUBSIDENCE Dan Whisman, Program Manager of the Department of Water Resource’s California Aqueduct Subsidence Program (or CASP) who gave a brief background and update on the efforts being undertaken in response to subsidence of the California Aqueduct in the San Joaquin Valley. The California Aqueduct is the […]
SJV WATER: SoCal water managers want to know who – exactly – is sinking the California Aqueduct
By Lois Henry, SJV Water A state report released in December pinned blame for sinking along the California Aqueduct on excessive nearby groundwater pumping to irrigate vineyards and nut orchards. That was a pretty pointed finger, but not pointed enough for some committee directors in the large and powerful Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. They wanted names. The issue came up at a meeting of MWD’s Water Planning and Stewardship Committee on Feb. 10 where a presentation was given […]
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT: Subsidence of the California Aqueduct in the San Joaquin Valley
Plus a brief update on the voluntary agreements, and good news on the Colorado River Recently, the Department of Water Resources released a report to supplement the 2017 California Aqueduct Subsidence Study (CASS) report that addresses the specific issues within a 10-mile-wide study corridor centered on the California Aqueduct south of San Luis Reservoir to the southern San Joaquin Valley and looked at predictions of future subsidence. At the February meeting of Metropolitan’s Water Planning and Stewardship Committee, Ted Craddock, […]
SJV WATER: Nuts getting a bad rap for sinking the California Aqueduct
By Lois Henry, SJV Water State water officials are blaming almond and pistachio orchards for sinking the California Aqueduct before all the evidence is in, according to one western Kern County water district manager. “They need to do more homework,” said Jason Gianquinto, General Manager of the Semitropic Water Storage District. “It’s easy to say, ‘Hey, this area is subsiding and, by the way, there’s ag here.’ But it’s not taking into account where the water for that ag is […]
SJV WATER: Extreme ag pumping threatens California’s main water artery
By Lois Henry, SJV Water Heavy groundwater pumping to sustain a massive increase in orchards and vineyards in the San Joaquin Valley has brought the state’s main water artery to the brink of permanent damage, according to report released by the Department of Water Resources Dec. 31. If groundwater pumping near the California Aqueduct continues at current levels through the next, inevitable drought, the land will sink further potentially resulting in “non-recoverable compaction and permanent land subsidence,” reducing the Aqueduct’s […]
Click here for all articles on California Aqueduct subsidence.
