“Reports this week from Iran’s West Asia News Agency and the New York Times indicate that the recent U.S. military strikes on Iran included attacks on civilian water systems, cutting off water for 20,000 villagers near the town of Bemani. These reports follow news from early March of attacks on desalination plants in Iran and Bahrain and highlight the growing problem of violence against water infrastructure.  Attacks on civilian water systems are war crimes, forbidden by the 1977 Protocols to the Geneva Convention and related international laws.  Reliable water resources are central for modern economies and especially the survival of communities in the arid Middle East. Iran, Israel, Palestinian territories, Syria, Lebanon and Persian Gulf countries are among the most water-poor nations of the world, with large and growing populations, few reliable perennial rivers, inconsistent rainfall and extensively over-tapped and overpumped groundwater. … ”  Read more from Peter Gleick at the San Francisco Chronicle.

NGOs say Water Board must compel Reclamation’s compliance with water rights permits for Shasta Temperature Management Plan

“San Francisco Baykeeper, the Winnemem Wintu Tribe, the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Restore the Delta, the Resource Renewal Institute, and Friends of the River sent a letter to the Executive Director of the State Water Resources Control Board supporting the decision to reject the Bureau of Reclamation’s Shasta Temperature Management Plan. However, they urged the Board to require Reclamation to comply with its permits, arguing that otherwise the Board’s response amounts to an objection in name only.  The groups describe Reclamation’s temperature and reservoir management strategy as unlawful and misguided, and they contend that the plan conflicts with the 2024 biological opinion issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service as well as Water Rights Order 90-5.  They argue that Reclamation has not meaningfully changed its plans or approach despite concerns raised by the Water Board, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Southwest Fisheries Science Center’s analysis of temperature-dependent mortality and related impacts on winter-run Chinook salmon. In their view, the Water Board was right to reject the plan. … ”  Continue reading at Maven’s Notebook.

California scales back golden mussel safeguards at vital reservoir, alarming experts

An aerial view shows high water conditions at Enterprise Bridge located at Lake Oroville in Butte County, California. Photo taken May 6, 2025.
On this date, the water storage was 3,355,264 acre-feet (AF), 98 percent of the total capacity.  Andrew Nixon / DWR

“The state of California is walking back protections meant to keep destructive golden mussels out of Lake Oroville, one of the largest and most important reservoirs in the state.  The move follows a new state-funded risk assessment that the invasive species poses a lower risk to the lake, which water managers say changes the state’s calculus on costly and difficult measures aimed at keeping the invaders at bay.  No state agencies or scientists have found mussels in Oroville yet. But invasive species experts say the revised policy of the Department of Water Resources increases the likelihood that golden mussels will invade Lake Oroville and hitch a ride on boats to other lakes.  They disagree, though, about whether preventing such an incursion is even possible.  ”California is under an epidemic of golden mussels,” said Anthony Ricciardi, a professor of biology and the director of the Bieler School of Environment at McGill University. “Like in any epidemic, you got to control the key hubs — or else the war is lost.” … ”  Continue reading from Cal Matters.