This just in … Breaking Delta tunnels news: DWR and Reclamation request 60 day continuance; Independent science review of Cal WaterFix aquatic science scheduled

Water agencies request 60 day continuance

NEW_DWR_LOGO_14inchReclamationThe Department of Water Resources and the Bureau of Reclamation have sent letter to the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting a 60-day continuance of the start of the California Water Fix water rights change petition.

The letter states:

Based upon recent success settling issues raised in the EIR/EIS process and ongoing discussions with protestants, Petitioners believe that a continuance could provide additonal time to resolve other protests to simply and expedite the hearing process.  The additonal time would also reduce the State Water Board’s burden of analyzing and deliberating on a number of parties claims and scope of the hearing.”

With DWR and Reclamation’s testimony and exhibits for Part 1A of the hearing due for submission to the Board by noon on March 30, 2016, they are requesting prompt approval.

Read the letter here:  CWF-60-Day-Continuance Request March 28, 2016

California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review scheduled for April 5-6

DSCLogoAt the request of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), select staff from the Delta Stewardship Council’s Delta Science Program will convene an independent scientific peer review for the joint Biological Opinion and 208 1(b) Incidental Take Permit analyses of the California WaterFix aquatic science on April 5 and 6.

The Delta Science Program, consistent with its mission to provide best available scientific information to assist decision making in the Delta, is employing the services of independent reviewers not involved in the ESA consultation and 2081(b) permit to comment on the use of the best available scientific and commercial information as it pertains to aquatic ESA and CESA listed species (aquatic species) in the development of the NMFS/FWS BO and the CDFW 2081(b) permit.

The role of the Independent Science Reviewer is to provide the investigative team with a balanced, considered and constructive review of three documents: 1)the draft BO analy5tical approach, 2)specific BA analyses (identified in the panel charge), and 3) the approach to analyzing the effects to longfin smelt.

——————————————–

Sign up for daily email service and you’ll always be one of the first to know!

  • Sign up for daily emails and get all the Notebook’s aggregated and original water news content delivered to your email box by 9AM. Breaking news alerts like this one, too. Sign me up!

keeping watchMaven’s Notebook
constantly watching over the world of California water

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: