PRESS RELEASES: Metropolitan board adopts two-year budget, funding work to reliably provide water to Southern California; LA Waterkeeper says it’s a step in the right direction

Budget includes 8.5% annual rate increases over next two years, anticipates small property tax increase

Press release from Metropolitan Water District:

Metropolitan Water District’s Board of Directors voted today to adopt a two-year budget that will allow the agency to continue delivering safe, reliable water supplies to Southern California, while managing challenges brought by climate change and rising costs due to inflation.

To ensure the continued sustainability of Metropolitan’s water system, the $2.4 billion annual budget includes rate increases of 8.5% on Jan. 1, 2025 and Jan. 1, 2026, charged to its 26 member agencies. For treated water, the rate increase will be 11% in 2025 and 10% in 2026. It also anticipates a small increase to the voter-approved property tax Metropolitan levies, amounting to an average increase of $2-3 a month for the median value home.

To avoid raising rates further, the budget also includes significant cost containment measures, including reducing departmental expenditures across various categories. In addition, Metropolitan is pursuing additional revenues through state and federal grants.

“We understand the impact rate increases can have on businesses and residents, so we have taken great steps to limit our increase as much as possible. But it is critical that we continue to fund investments and programs that bring safe water to our communities, with no one left behind,” Metropolitan General Manager Adel Hagekhalil said. “The difficult reality is, our costs have risen while revenues have dropped, so we need to take the fiscally responsible step of adjusting our rates.”

Hagekhalil explained that additional revenues are necessary because of low water sales, due to extreme drought and record-breaking precipitation. In addition, Metropolitan’s expenses have increased as inflation has driven up commodity prices, labor and energy costs. Further, Metropolitan is facing the need to fully recover costs and maintain minimum reserves for unanticipated expenses, after limiting rate increases in recent years.

The biennial budget includes capital investment spending of about $636 million over the next two years to ensure the continued reliability of Metropolitan’s distribution system and to increase the system’s resiliency to better respond to climate change. It also includes nearly $100 million in funding for conservation programs over the next two years.

While the budget continues to fund ongoing environmental planning work for Metropolitan’s Pure Water Southern California regional recycled water program and the state’s Delta Conveyance Project, it does not commit long-term funding to the construction of either project. Metropolitan will consider the future of those projects, and other large-scale investments in new local supplies, storage, conservation and conveyance, through its Climate Adaptation Master Plan for Water process.

“Metropolitan is in a transformational period, facing critical decisions on which long-term projects to invest in to help our region adapt to climate change. CAMP4Water will provide a framework to help guide these strategic decisions,” Metropolitan board Chair Adán Ortega, Jr. said. “At the same time, we need to rethink our business model, so we can fund these major investments.”                                                                                          ,

“As we embark on these major changes, this budget provides us the fiscal stability we need for the next two years,” Ortega added. “The budget dovetails with the new business model process to ensure the means for resilient infrastructure investment for climate adaptation and to address inequities such as the treatment surcharge.”

The budget and rates approved today evolved through months of transparent deliberations, including input from member agencies, interested parties and the public. Metropolitan’s board began discussing the budget in February and has held four public workshops since then to consider Metropolitan’s expenditures and revenues.

Through those discussions, the board determined Metropolitan needs to take a step toward a more stable revenue stream, rather than relying as heavily on water sales, which can vary dramatically year to year based on hydrology. In response, the board decided to consider increasing Metropolitan’s ad valorem property tax.

Property taxes have been collected for decades to fund Metropolitan’s State Water Project costs, as approved by voters. The last time Metropolitan raised its ad valorem property tax rate was 1990. Since then, it has steadily decreased to 0.0035%, where it has been for the past decade. The adopted budget assumes the board will increase the rate to 0.007% in August.

In addition to providing a more stable revenue stream, increasing property tax revenues allows the board to lower the rate increase from what was initially proposed.

LA Waterkeeper Statement on Metropolitan Water District Budget Adoption: “An Important Step in the Right Direction”

Press release from LA Waterkeeper

Today, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) adopted a new two-year budget. In 2023, MWD faced a budget shortfall of more than $250 million. Due to this significant shortfall, the agency will raise rates by 8.5% for each of the upcoming fiscal years, for a total of 17% by 2026. For the first time in several decades, MWD also increased the rate of its ad valorem property tax as part of its budget. The cost per median property value in MWD’s service area under the new budget will top out at approximately $140/year for Southern California’s wealthiest areas and will be as low as approximately $27/year in lower-income areas.

“Relying a bit more on property tax revenue and a bit less on how much water customers pay per gallon of water is both a more reliable way to generate funds for MWD and a more equitable approach to securing water for Southern Californian residents,” said Bruce Reznik, executive director of LA Waterkeeper. “Everyone is focused on making sure we all have reliable access to water that is as affordable as possible. This shift gets us closer to that goal.”

Relying more on property taxes for revenue is a preview of MWD’s larger effort to rethink its business model and overall approach to providing water in the face of weather extremes and less reliable water imports in the era of climate change. The development of MWD’s Climate Adaptation Master Plan for Water (CAMP4W) will be a year-long process that invites public involvement as it reevaluates how it can support the region’s efforts to become more climate resilient.

MWD’s budget relies disproportionately on revenue from selling water compared to how other water suppliers around the state raise revenue. Right now, MWD only brings in about 20% of its income from fixed sources like property taxes and fixed charges (despite 80% of its costs being fixed), while most other water contractors generate more than half their income through fixed sources. Relying so extensively on water sales is problematic because the amount of water sold year-by-year can fluctuate dramatically, which creates budget uncertainty and can disincentivize water conservation. Because property taxes don’t fluctuate the way water sales do, this minor increase in property tax rates will have a relatively low impact on Southern California households while improving the stability of revenues for the region’s main water supplier.

“Stabilizing revenues will enhance MWD’s ability to invest in conservation and environmentally sound opportunities for storing and generating local water, like through stormwater capture, wastewater recycling and groundwater cleanup. These options are more sustainable and more equitable than continuing to rely on water imports,” added Reznik. “It’s exciting to see our region’s main water supplier looking to the future with clear eyes and sustainability in mind. As MWD launches its broader CAMP4W process, LAW will be releasing its own recommendations for how the agency’s business model can be updated to meet today’s challenges.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email