Ground view of the Yolo Bypass and the Vic Fazio Wildlife Area looking east toward West Sacramento and Downtown Sacramento. The Yolo Bypass is one of two flood bypasses in the Sacramento Valley located in Yolo and Solano Counties and protects Sacramento and other riverside communities from flooding through a system of weirs. Flood control is the main purpose of the Yolo Bypass and is crossed by the Yolo Causeway. Shot - February 3, 2008. Steve Payer/California Department of Water Resources

PRESS RELEASE: Yolo County Files Lawsuit Against California Department of Water Resources Challenging Undisclosed and Harmful Features of the Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project

Press release from Yolo County:

Today, Yolo County has taken the necessary step of filing a lawsuit against the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in connection with certain undisclosed aspects of the Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project. The lawsuit is necessary to safeguard the interests of Yolo County residents, protect agriculture, and maintain transparency surrounding important projects.

The lawsuit asserts that DWR violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by failing to disclose the conveyance capacity of operable gates at the Fremont Weir. Currently being built seven miles northeast of the City of Woodland, these operable gates will be able to convey twice as much water from the Sacramento River into the farm fields in the Yolo Bypass than DWR previously disclosed publicly. The County discovered that the Project is being built to release 12,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), rather than the 6,000 cfs rate DWR disclosed in public documents, which equates roughly to the entire Sacramento River flow at the Fremont Weir on a typical summer day.

Additionally, the petition asserts that DWR violated CEQA by making changes to the project after its initial approval. DWR’s elimination of levee cutoff walls, which serve as protective features against damage caused by water flow, raises concerns about potential impacts on groundwater levels, drainage, and agriculture in the Elkhorn area. Yolo County believes that these changes should have been subject to public notification and analysis of potential consequences.

“We were disappointed to learn that DWR appeared to withhold the true scope of the project in public meetings and in the environmental review process over the course of several years,” said Yolo County Supervisor Jim Provenza. “DWR produced over 10,000 pages of material describing the Project and its potential impacts, always describing the project as having a 6,000 cfs design capacity. I personally met with DWR leadership for years regarding the project, only to recently learn it is twice the size they advised us and the public all along.”

Supervisor Gary Sandy agreed. “DWR has long known about Yolo County’s concerns about the project and its potential impacts on agriculture. A larger project only increases those concerns, and changing it to eliminate levee protection features is a step in the wrong direction with the potential for additional impacts to farming in the Elkhorn area east of the Yolo Bypass.”

The County’s lawsuit seeks various forms of relief, including a halt to the project’s construction and its operations until DWR resolves the legal issues raised by the County. A copy of the petition filed in the Yolo County Superior Court is available here.

Yolo County files suit against DWR

Print Friendly, PDF & Email