Surface storage offers a mixed bag of benefits and impacts. On the one hand, dams can provide water storage, flood control, hydropower, and recreation; on the other hand, dams can disrupt ecosystems, impact native species populations, block sediment transport, and cause water quality problems. The mix of benefits and impacts is highly dependent on where and how a reservoir is built.
Ever since the Gold Rush days, building dams and canals has been California’s answer to dealing with its unpredictable hydrology. More than 1,400 dams and thousands of miles of canals and aqueducts have been built to move water from the mountains where it falls to the farms and cities where it’s used. These dams capture and store runoff for use during drier times, provide flood control for downstream communities, and generate hydropower. However, construction of these dams has come with serious ecological costs, among them a decline in abundance of native species, fragmented ecosystems, degradation of downstream habitat, and water quality impacts.
California has nearly 200 reservoirs with a capacity of 10,000 acre-feet or more; their combined surface storage capacity is more than 41 million acre-feet. Some of the state’s largest reservoirs are major components of the state and federal water projects. However, there are many smaller reservoirs that serve local or regional needs for a multitude of purposes.
Most of the state’s reservoirs were built in the early to mid-twentieth century with only one or two basic purposes, such as water supply or flood control. However, with the onset of environmental regulations in the 1970s, over time the role of surface storage has evolved beyond these primary purposes to include other objectives such as water quality management, ecosystem management, and recreation. New regulations and legislation have added new constraints and objectives, requiring many reservoirs to operate differently then what was envisioned when they were built. So at the same time as competing demands for water have increased, the operational flexibility of various surface water systems has decreased.
The majority of the state’s dams were constructed more than 40 years ago. In recent decades, construction has slowed; only six new water supply reservoirs were constructed from 1980 to 2000, and only three have been completed since 2000. Some surface storage reservoirs have been enlarged since 2000.
TYPES OF SURFACE STORAGE
There are two types of surface storage reservoirs:
Reservoirs which are formed by building a dam across a river, such as Shasta Dam on the Sacramento River, Oroville Dam on the Feather River, and Friant Dam on the San Joaquin River. These dams also typically provide flood protection.
Reservoirs which are built not built across a waterway, but instead at particular location and are filled by conveying water and pumping it into the reservoir; these reservoirs are referred to as “off-stream” reservoirs. Examples in California are San Luis Reservoir near Los Banos, Los Vaqueros Reservoir in the East Bay, and Diamond Valley Lake in Southern California. Because off-stream reservoirs are not blocking a flowing river or stream, they generally have less environmental impacts.
IF YOU BUILD IT, WILL IT FILL?
It should be noted that simply building more surface water storage does not necessarily equate to more water supply; there must be a water source from which to fill it. The white paper, Integrating Surface Water Storage into California’s Changing Water System in November of 2014 found that at most, California’s largest water systems could potentially use between 5 and 6 million acre-feet of storage capacity; the potential is limited by a lack of additional streamflow needed to fill an expanded storage system.
In the paper, the authors explained why doubling the size of a reservoir does not double water deliveries: “Water deliveries are ultimately limited by the amount of water flowing into a reservoir. A small reservoir in a watershed with variable inflows will greatly improve regular water deliveries. But, as the reservoir size increases, compared with the amount of inflow available to fill the reservoir, the available storage space is filled less and less frequently, which means that the each additional increment of added storage capacity provides less and less water supply benefit.”
The paper also determined that the ability to utilize additional water storage varies greatly with location, water conveyance capacity, and how well the storage is integrated with the other components of the water system.
It’s also important to note that surface storage has limited value during long droughts. Reservoirs capture water during wet times, reserving some for dry years. As years progress during extended droughts, these reserves simply become depleted.
SURFACE STORAGE WORKS BETTER WHEN MANAGED CONJUNCTIVELY WITH GROUNDWATER
Conjunctive management involves moving water from reservoirs and storm runoff during wet periods into groundwater basins for use during dry periods. By managing surface water and groundwater storage conjunctively, the study found that the greatest benefit can be achieved, expanding annual water delivery to as much as 20 percent of the increase in storage capacity.
BENEFITS OF SURFACE STORAGE
Dams provide a wide range of economic, environmental, and social benefits. Surface storage reservoirs store water from the wet winter season for use in the dry summer and fall months. Dams provide flood control, preventing the loss of life and property caused by flooding by impounding floodwaters and then controlling the release to the river. Dams can also provide renewable electricity in the form of hydropower and a wide range of recreation benefits, such as boating, skiing, and camping.
Surface storage is an essential component of a conjunctive management program by controlling the timing and volume of water used to recharge groundwater basins. Surface storage can also help facilitate water transfers.
IMPACTS OF SURFACE STORAGE
The benefits of surface storage can come with some considerable impacts. Building a dam across a river or stream fragments the ecosystem and can impede or prevent fish and wildlife migration. In California, estimates are that dams block much of the spawning habitat in the Central Valley. Habitat loss and degradation has been implicated in the decline of native species, particularly salmon.
The relatively stable flows released from reservoirs can be damaging to native species and vegetation that evolved with variable flows and the change in timing of those flows can disrupt life-cycle processes that are cued to seasonal flow patterns. The reduced occurrence of floodplain inundation impacts native species that depend on floodplain habitats for feeding and growth.
Dams also block the movement of sediments as rocks, sand, and other natural materials build up at the mouth of the reservoir instead of dispersing with the flow through the channel. The loss of this sediment can impact downstream habitats by causing erosion of channel bed and banks and loss of spawning gravels for salmon and trout. Reduced sediment delivery from rivers to coastal areas also leads to accelerated beach erosion.
Dams can also degrade water quality as organic material that would have otherwise been washed downstream now builds up in the reservoir; as it decomposes, it consumes large amounts of oxygen, which can lead to algae blooms and oxygen-deprived dead zones incapable of supporting aquatic species.
Generally speaking, because off-stream reservoirs are not blocking a natural watercourse, they tend to have less environmental impacts.
New surface storage projects are required to address impacts under the application of various laws, regulatory processes and statutes, among them the public trust doctrine, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and federal and state clean water act regulations. Mitigation of environmental impacts is required by avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, or compensating for negative impacts.
SURFACE STORAGE AND CLIMATE CHANGE
With climate change projected to bring more extreme floods and deeper droughts, expanding surface storage capacity can be an effective climate change adaptation strategy. Increased storage capacity can give greater flexibility to capture increased runoff and provide additional flood protection, and the ability to store water from wetter years for use in drier years will help address climate variability.
However, climate change could potentially complicate reservoir operations. Most on-stream surface storage reservoirs also serve a flood protection role, and a shrinking snowpack and smaller spring runoff will bring with it the complexity of managing reservoirs for competing purposes such as flood control, water supply, and hydropower.
BUILDING NEW STORAGE IN CALIFORNIA: THE WATER STORAGE INVESTMENT PROGRAM
In November of 2014, California voters approved Proposition 1, the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act, a $7.5 billion water bond for investments in the state’s water management systems. The bond included $2.7 billion to pay for public benefits related to new water storage projects, both surface storage and groundwater storage.
The California Water Commission will fund the public benefits of water storage projects that improve the operation of the state water system, are cost effective, and provide a net improvement in ecosystem and water quality conditions. Those public benefits include ecosystem improvements, water quality improvements, flood control, emergency response and recreation.
The project application period opened up in spring of 2017 and extends through until August of 2017. A decision on which storage projects will receive funding from the Commission is not expected until 2018.
Click here to download the regional/local storage resource management strategy from the California Water Plan.
Click here to download the CalFed surface storage resource management strategy from the California Water Plan.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Helpful documents and websites …
- Integrating Storage in California’s Changing Water System, white paper by Jay Lund, et al; November 2014
- Water Storage in California, journal article from The Water Report, August 2016
- California’s Water: Storing Water, webpage from the Association of California Water Agencies
- How dams damage rivers, webpage from American Rivers
- The World Commission on Dams
State agencies …
For the latest reservoir conditions …
- Click here for a graphic of conditions at the state’s major reservoirs.
- Click here for reservoir conditions at individual reservoirs statewide.
Large reservoir projects currently under consideration …
This is not necessarily a complete list.
- Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation, feasibility study for the proposal to raise Shasta Dam
- North of Delta Offstream Storage, feasibility study documents for proposed Sites Reservoir
- Sites Reservoir Project, website from the proponents of the reservoir
- Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation, feasibility study documents for the proposed Temperance Flat project
More on water storage from Maven’s Notebook …
- SHASTA DAM RAISE PROJECT: Scoping comment deadline extended to January 14; Scoping meeting presentation and posters now available Posted on: December 21, 2018
From Westlands Water District: Westlands is preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the Shasta Dam Raise Project (Project). Formerly known as the Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation (SLWRI), the Project would increase the height of Shasta Dam by 18.5 feet and expand capacity of Shasta Lake by up to 634,000 acre feet. [...]
- WATER STORAGE INVESTMENT PGM: New water storage projects showcased at the California Water Commission Posted on: December 19, 2017
Proponents of water storage projects competing for Prop 1 funds present their projects to the California Water Commission The nine members of the California Water Commission have been tasked with deciding how to award the $2.7 billion in Prop 1 funds slated to pay for the public benefits of water storage projects, and competition is pretty fierce. Eleven storage projects [...]
- ANNOUNCEMENT: Public meetings for Sites Project draft environmental review documents Posted on: November 30, 2017
From the Sites Project Authority and the US Bureau of Reclamation: WHO: The Sites Project Authority (Authority) and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) are hosting two public meetings to solicit input from the public, Tribes and agencies on the Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIR/EIS) for the Sites Project. In preparing the Draft EIR/EIS, the Authority serves as [...]
- CA WATER COMMISSION: Water storage infrastructure in the 21st century Posted on: October 27, 2017
The nine members of the California Water Commission have been given a task: to decide how to award the $2.7 billion in Prop 1 funds slated for water storage; twelve projects have submitted applications. In order to be better informed prior to making the decision, the Commission has been hearing from panels of experts at its monthly meetings. In September, [...]
- DELTA STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL: Overview of the Association of California Water Agencies Storage Integration Study Posted on: September 7, 2017
Study finds that by building new storage and integrating their operations with existing storage would increase water delivery by 400 TAF/year on average and over 700 TAF in dry years In July of this year, the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) released a study, 21st Century Water Infrastructure: New Approaches to Create Flexibility and Resiliency, which examined how the [...]