NEWS WORTH NOTING: Now available: Bay-Delta Plan Biological Goals Scientific Advisory Panel Final Report; Attorney General Becerra to Army Corps: Directive to weaken state oversight of water quality is unlawful
Now available: Bay-Delta Plan Biological Goals Scientific Advisory Panel Final Report
From the Delta Science Program:
Requested by the State Water Board and facilitated by the Delta Science Program, the panel provided recommendations for developing scientifically defensible methods for formulating biological goals that can be used to assess progress toward achieving the Bay-Delta Plan’s narrative objectives.
Attorney General Becerra to Army Corps: Directive to Weaken State Oversight of Water Quality is Unlawful
From the Office of the Attorney General:
“California Attorney General Xavier Becerra today joined a multistate comment letter objecting to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Army Corps) directive to weaken states’ oversight of projects impacting water quality. The Army Corps’ directive would drastically shorten timeframes for state water quality certifications under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). This abbreviated timeframe would prevent states from adequately assessing the water quality impacts of proposed federal projects to ensure states’ water resources are protected.
“This directive is another egregious attempt by the Trump Administration to illegally weaken the protections afforded by the Clean Water Act,” said Attorney General Becerra. “California has an inherent right under the Clean Water Act to evaluate whether projects meet our water quality standards and to impose conditions to protect our waters.”
Under the CWA, a project requiring federal approval that may result in discharges into “waters of the United States” must obtain the state’s certification that the project meets state water quality standards. Under Section 401, a state must act on a request for certification within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed one year. If the state does not act within that period, the certification requirements are waived. The Army Corps’ directive seeks to drastically reduce the time period for state review from one year to 60 days, even if the request is incomplete or otherwise deficient. If implemented, the directive would deprive the nation’s waters of CWA protections, because California and other states will have insufficient time to ensure that projects comply with state water quality standards.
The multistate comment letter argues that the directive conflicts with both the CWA and the Administrative Procedure Act. By imposing a shortened 60-day default time period for states to evaluate a project and ensure compliance with state water quality standards, the directive is inconsistent with the CWA’s primary objective to protect water quality.
Joining Attorney General Becerra in writing the comment letter are the Attorneys General of New York, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia.
Get the Notebook blog by email and never miss a post!
Sign up for daily emails and get all the Notebook’s aggregated and original water news content delivered to your email box by 9AM. Breaking news alerts, too. Sign me up!
About News Worth Noting: News Worth Noting is a collection of press releases, media statements, and other materials produced by federal, state, and local government agencies, water agencies, and academic institutions, as well as non-profit and advocacy organizations. News Worth Noting also includes relevant legislator statements and environmental policy and legal analyses that are publicly released by law firms. If your agency or organization has an item you would like included here, please email it to Maven.