NEWS WORTH NOTING: New report on considerations for local groundwater markets; DWR releases PSP for Prop 1 water desalination grants; Public opinion poll shows high level of confidence in San Diego’s water supply reliability

New report: Trading Sustainably: Critical Considerations for Local Groundwater Markets Under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act,

From UC Berkeley School of Law, Center for Law, Energy & the Environment

We are pleased to share with you our new report, Trading Sustainably: Critical Considerations for Local Groundwater Markets Under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, from the Center for Law, Energy & the Environment at UC Berkeley School of Law.

California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) potentially opens the door for local groundwater markets.  However, it does not provide guidance about when such markets might be useful and appropriate.  While carefully designed and implemented markets could help achieve sustainability goals in some areas, success is not a foregone conclusion and careful planning will be needed to avoid unintended consequences.  Our report identifies a set of considerations for evaluating whether and under what conditions groundwater trading might contribute to sustainably managing a particular groundwater basin.

The full report and executive summary are available at

DWR Releases Proposal Solicitation Package for Proposition 1 Water Desalination Grants

From the Department of Water Resources:

The Department of Water Resources (DWR) has released the final Water Desalination Grant Program Round 4 Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP), which also includes the guidelines for the grant program.  The grant program is funded by Proposition 1, the $7.5 billion water bond overwhelmingly approved by California voters in 2014.  Proposition 1 authorized the Legislature to appropriate funds for competitive grants for the desalination of brackish or seawater.  The Legislature appropriated $93.1 million for this program, which is available in fiscal years 2017-18 and 2018-19.  Applications are now being accepted through September 1, 2017.

The intent of the Water Desalination Grant Program is to produce a potable water supply for municipal water uses through treatment of a natural saline raw water source.  The primary benefits are increased water supply and reliability of supply.  Applications are being accepted for five project types:  construction, design pilot projects, feasibility studies, environmental documentation, and research pilot projects.  Entities that may apply for grants are public agencies including local and State government agencies, public utilities, mutual water companies, federally recognized Indian Tribes, State Indian Tribes on the Native American Heritage Commission’s consultation list, and non-profit organizations.  Universities and colleges incorporated as public institutions or non-profit organizations may also apply.  Additional details about the grant program are available on the program Round 4 webpage.

DWR will host two public workshops in early August to explain the grant program rules and how to submit an application using the online submittal tool called GRanTS:

Los Angeles, CA
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
10:00 am to no later than 1:00 pm
Meeting Room US1-102

Metropolitan Water District
700 N Alameda St, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Monterey, CA
(Central Coast)
Thursday, August 3, 2017
9:00 am to no later than 12:00 pm
Building G, Conference Room
Monterey Peninsula Water Mgmt. District
5 Harris Ct., Bldg G, Monterey, CA 93940


Public Opinion Poll Shows High Level of Confidence in San Diego’s Water Supply Reliability

New research also reveals consistent support for using water efficiently, supply diversification and value of water service

From the San Diego County Water Authority:

In the wake of one of the most significant droughts in California’s history, public confidence in the reliability of the San Diego region’s water supply has grown to extraordinarily high levels, according to the San Diego County Water Authority’s most recent public opinion poll. Residents also continued to show strong support for the region’s water supply diversification strategy, using water efficiently and the value of water compared to other utilities.

The Water Authority has performed periodic public opinion research for more than 17 years to determine local residents’ knowledge and attitudes regarding water issues. The latest poll of 1,001 adults in San Diego County was conducted by Probe Research from May 3 to May 25, approximately a month after Gov. Jerry Brown ended the statewide drought emergency he declared in 2014. Water Authority staff presented poll results to the agency’s Board of Directors last week.

An overwhelming majority (83 percent) of respondents viewed the region’s water supply as somewhat or very reliable, outpacing results in the 2015 (65 percent) and 2014 (70 percent) surveys. Overall, 80 percent of respondents in 2017 had a positive outlook on San Diego County’s water supply, believing it is improving (41 percent) or holding steady (39 percent).

Residents continued to show overwhelming support (79 percent) for the Water Authority’s supply diversification strategy, which includes Colorado River water transfers, water-use efficiency, local supply development efforts such as groundwater and recycling, and the addition of desalinated seawater in late 2015 from the Claude “Bud” Lewis Carlsbad Desalination Plant. Meanwhile, public trust in water agencies to ensure the region has a reliable long-term supply of water is rising. Nearly six in 10 residents now hold that confidence, up from 48 percent in 2014 and 51 percent in 2015.

“Coming out of this most recent drought that challenged so many communities across the state, it’s great to see that the public feels more secure about our region’s water supply reliability than before,” said Mark Muir, chair of the Water Authority’s Board. “Our residents continue to support supply diversification, are willing to continue to use water efficiently no matter the weather, and recognize the need to ensure ongoing water security for our region’s 3.3 million people and $222 billion economy.”

As state regulators develop a new long-term policy for regulating water use statewide, poll respondents strongly supported taking a balanced approach to water management in California. Two-thirds (66 percent) indicated the best way for the state to meet future water needs is to both save water and make investments in local supplies. Only 28 percent said the best strategy is to focus principally on saving water.

While the state’s emergency water-use reduction mandates have ended, San Diego County residents maintained a widespread belief in the need to continue using water efficiently. An overwhelming majority of poll respondents – 92 percent – predicted they will use less or about the same amount of water in 2017 as they did the year before. Only 5 percent predicted they will use more.  In addition, 81 percent said water-use efficiency is a civic duty.

Two-thirds (67 percent) of respondents said water is a good or excellent value compared to other utilities, consistent with the 2015 poll. However, very few residents (1 percent) could accurately estimate how much tap water costs. About half (53 percent) were unsure, and 17 percent perceived the cost to be more than $1 per gallon. After respondents were informed that the retail cost of municipal tap water in the San Diego region is about one cent per gallon, 76 percent said it was a good or excellent value.

Although the public’s willingness to pay more for additional local water supply development has slipped, there was still a significant reservoir of support for such costs in the 2017 poll. Nearly a quarter (24 percent) said they would not pay more for additional supplies, up from 16 percent in 2015. Nearly a third (32 percent) were open to such costs in 2017, with the mean willing to pay $7.78 more per month. Nearly half (44 percent) said they were unsure or would require more information.

Additional findings include:

  • Water supply reliability was no longer seen as the most pressing issue facing San Diego County, as it was in the 2015 survey. Only 6 percent of respondents cited water supply/drought as top-of-mind issues on an unaided basis. Affordable housing came in as the most prominent top-of-mind issue, with 13 percent of responses.
  • A reliable water supply was widely seen as important for San Diego County, with 84 percent of respondents saying it is essential for a healthy economy and 80 percent agreeing it is essential for their quality of life.
  • Four in 10 (40 percent) respondents expected to pay more for a reliable water supply even while they are reducing their water use.
  • More than four in 10 respondents (41 percent) moderately or strongly agreed that additional rate increases are necessary to support regional water supply reliability, a slight decrease from 2015 (44 percent), but still above 2014 levels (33 percent).
  • A majority of residents (56 percent) agreed that it costs more to provide a reliable water supply in San Diego County than in most other parts of the country.
  • About half (51 percent) agreed that they could do more to conserve water at home; 22 percent disagreed.
  • Supporters of mixing advanced treated recycled water into the supply of drinking water (61 percent) significantly outweigh opponents (31 percent).

Probe Research conducted the 2017 survey by a random telephone sample of 500 respondents (including 150 respondents who only use a mobile phone), and 501 online respondents chosen from a custom panel of San Diego County residents who have agreed to participate in online surveys. All participants were at least 18 years old and had lived in the county for at least one year.

Because an online survey is a sample of convenience – rather than a probability sample – no margin-of-error can be ascribed to the overall combined survey sample. However, comparisons of results across the two samples provide a high degree of confidence that the survey accurately reflects public opinion in San Diego County on water-related issues. A strict probability sample of 1,000 adults (i.e. no online component) would have a margin of error of ± 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

The full results of the 2017 poll and prior polls are available at


Daily emailsGet the Notebook blog by email and never miss a post!

Sign up for daily emails and get all the Notebook’s aggregated and original water news content delivered to your email box by 9AM. Breaking news alerts, too. Sign me up!


About News Worth Noting:  News Worth Noting is a collection of press releases, media statements, and other materials produced by federal, state, and local government agencies, water agencies, and academic institutions, as well as non-profit and advocacy organizations.  News Worth Noting also includes relevant legislator statements and environmental policy and legal analyses that are publicly released by law firms.  If your agency or organization has an item you would like included here, please email it to Maven.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
%d bloggers like this: